Intuition or deliberation - How do professionals make decisions in action?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Despite intense research on decision-making in action, we still know little about when decision-makers rely on deliberate vs. intuitive decision-making in decision situations under complexity and uncertainty. This paper studies decision-making modes (deliberate vs. intuitive) in complex task environments contingent on perceived complexity, experience, and decision style preference. We find that relatively inexperienced decision-makers respond to increases in subjective complexity with an increase in deliberation and tend to follow their decision style preference. Experienced decision-makers are less guided by their decision preference and respond to increases in subjective complexity only minimally. Our paper contributes to a developing stream of research linking decision-making with intra-personal and environmental properties and fosters our understanding of the conditions under which decision-makers rely on intuitive vs. deliberate decision modes. In doing so, we go one step further towards a comprehensive theory of decision-making in action.
منابع مشابه
Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model
Humans often make decisions in stressful situations, for example when the stakes are high and the potential consequences severe, or when the clock is ticking and the task demand is overwhelming. In response, a whole train of biological responses to stress has evolved to allow organisms to make a fight-or-flight response. When under stress, fast and effortless heuristics may dominate over slow a...
متن کاملDeliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India
Groups make decisions on both the production and the distribution of resources. These decisions typically involve a tension between increasing the total level of group resources (i.e. social efficiency) and distributing these resources among group members (i.e. individuals' relative shares). This is the case because the redistribution process may destroy part of the resources, thus resulting in...
متن کاملMulla Sadra on Virtue and Action
This paper sheds light on the views of Mulla Sadra about virtue and action. The main question is how he explains the relationship, if any, between virtue and action. Mulla Sadra defines moral virtue as a settled inner disposition by which one acts morally, without need for any reflection or deliberation. This study seeks to explain how, according to Mulla Sadra, a virtue motivates the agent and...
متن کاملThinking Fast and Slow: An Approach to Energy-Efficient Human Activity Recognition on Mobile Devices
48 AI MAGAZINE In his Nobel Prize–winning work, Daniel Kahneman (2011) challenged the traditional rational model of human judgment and decision making by proposing a model of two systems: system 1 is fast, intuitive, and emotional, while system 2 is slower, more deliberative, and more logical. According to his theory, a human being sometimes makes decisions deliberately and sometimes relies on ...
متن کاملI-14: The Impact of Disclosure Decisions on Donor Gamete Participants: Donors, Intended Parents and Offspring
To discuss the psychological impact of disclosure decisions on donor gamete participants including gamete donors, intended parents, and the children conceived through these third party reproductive techniques. In the past decade, there has been a dramatic increase worldwide in the number of children born as a result of gamete donation. The growing demand for these programs has resulted in a tre...
متن کامل